Modernising Education Provision

(MEP)

2.1 Notable progress has been achieved during 2006/2007 on all aspects of MEP, with the capital investment programme in particular gaining increasing momentum.

2.2 The following significant achievements have been secured during the year:

2.3 During the year the School Modernisation Team has succeeded in significantly increasing the amount of external grant support for the delivery of the capital programme. The Council's allocation of School Building Improvement Grant (SBIB) from WAG at the start of the financial year was £5.162 million. During the course of the year it became evident that other authorities across Wales would not be able to expend their full allocations of SBIG and this Council was able to accept an additional £1 million, accelerated from its forward allocation, to spend within the year. Additionally, MEP was able to benefit from an allocation of £161k from the Early Years Partnership. Furthermore, confirmation was received from WAG that the Council's bid for grant funding to support the establishment of a regional hub for special education needs provision at the new Queen Elizabeth High School had been successful, with a total sum of £720k allocated for expenditure in 2007/2008.

2.4 The following school infrastructure development or improvement projects are at the construction stage:

3 Factors Influencing the Future Development and Delivery of MEP

Introduction

3.1 Significant change has taken place in the national policy framework for education over the past six years since the Planning School Places Strategy was originally adopted. A great deal of this change has occurred within the last two years since the MEP Strategy and Timeline were approved with considerable movement actually having taken place during the past year.

3.2 Whilst a positive momentum has now been established across all elements of MEP it is important that MEP retains flexibility at its heart as it moves forward so that it maintains pace and alignment with the changing external policy framework, encompasses changing expectation and supports school improvement in every sense.

Policy Framework Developments

3.3 New or revised policies or guidance, which have a bearing on MEP, have emerged in the following areas over recent years:

3.4 These issues were evaluated in a report presented informally to the Executive Board in February 2007 and their implications for school organisation and buildings are being reflected in the continuing development of the MEP programme. Over the past few weeks further developments have taken place in the following areas and need to be considered.

3.5 In January 2007 Estyn published a report entitled "An Evaluation of Performance of Schools Before and After Moving into New Buildings or Significantly Refurbished Premises" which presented the findings of a study conducted by Her Majesty's Inspectorate to evaluate the impact of the quality of school buildings on the performance of schools.

3.6 For the purposes of the report the performance of schools is assessed by reference to the Estyn inspection themes and grades:

3.7 The main findings of the research are:

3.8 The report also makes reference to other research carried out in recent years in America and England, which concludes:

3.9 The expanding research evidence and analysis confirms the educational and social benefits of investing in improved school buildings, reinforcing the importance of MEP as a strategic development and service improvement strategy.

Sustainable Development and Sustainable Schools

3.11 In February 2007 the Minister for Environment, Planning and Countryside at the Welsh Assembly Government, Carwyn Jones AM, made a statement in plenary session to the National Assembly for Wales in which he declared his intention to make it a requirement, within six months, that all new buildings in Wales constructed with financial support from the Assembly shall achieve a BREEAM "excellent" rating.

3.14 The County Council had adopted an objective to have all new school buildings achieve at least a BREEAM "very good" rating but this will need to be reviewed in the light of the Minister's statement. Based on research published in 2006 it could be concluded that a "very good" rating could be achieved at negligible additional cost but to secure an "excellent" rating will certainly involve additional cost, but the exact financial implications cannot be assessed at this time. An exercise has been commenced to assess the effect of upgrading a new school from "very good" to "excellent" standard and the outcome of this will inform the design and cost profiling of future projects.

3.15 A number of school development projects within MEP are supported by School Building Improvement Grant (SBIG) from WAG. Officers have written to WAG to seek clarification of the implications of the Ministers statement for current and future projects supported by SBIG and are awaiting a response.

3.16 The present MEP cost estimates are based upon securing a BREEAM "very good" rating but these will need to be reviewed once the exercise referred to above has been completed and once further guidance has been received from WAG on the implications of the Minister's statement and how this translates to the future allocation of School Building Improvement Grant (SBIG).

3.23 On the 15th March 2007 the Minister for Education, Lifelong Learning and Skills at WAG, Jane Davidson AM, wrote to the Executive Board or Cabinet Member with responsibility for Education in every council in Wales on the subject of strategic planning for the improvement of school buildings.

3.24 In her letter the Minister reiterated the Assembly Government's objective to have every school in Wales fit for purpose and in good physical shape as soon as practicable. Her present assessment is that half of Welsh councils are making good progress and have a clear picture of the reorganisation of provision they need to undertake and a clear view of the investment they need to make to deliver reorganized provision in buildings that are fit for purpose. She expresses her concern that the remainder still lag behind.

3.25 The Minister declares her intention to make it a requirement that once the present arrangement for distributing SBIG ceases in 2010 future funding beyond that time provided by the Assembly will depend upon councils having properly developed plans and strategies in place. SBIG grant will be directed at those authorities that have robust plans and have demonstrated a good track record in delivering investment programmes using SBIG and by directing significant amounts of their own resources in their schools capital programme through general capital funding, capital receipts and prudential borrowing. The Minister envisages that from 2009 - 2010 onwards targeting arrangements for SBIG funding will begin to apply.

3.26 The Minister gives notice that all authorities will be visited over the coming months to review their position on forward planning and by July of this year an agreement is expected with each authority on a target date for reaching the fitness standard. The individual targets will replace the previous general target for Wales of having all schools fit for purpose by 2010 as this is now acknowledged to be unachievable.

3.27 As noted in the introduction to this report this Council's forward strategic planning has to date been held in high regard by WAG. The Council does, however, need to ensure that its strategic planning is kept up to date and is adapted to reflect changes taking place in the national policy framework for education, as noted above.

3.28 The Asset Management Plan (AMP) for schools was produced in 2005. Since this time there has been significant change to the programme of action for the development and rationalisation of the asset base, to the extent that the AMP now requires updating.

3.29 A review of the corporate Asset Management Plan is planned for 2007/2008 and it will be opportune to review the service asset management plan for schools within the same timeframe, to ensure that it provides the strategic development framework for school buildings expected by WAG.

Estyn - Transforming Schools: A Discussion Paper

3.30 In March 2007 Estyn published a document entitled "Transforming Schools: A Discussion Paper" in which it sets out the main challenges and opportunities facing schools in Wales with the aim of engaging all those who have a stake in improving education in Wales.

3.31 The paper is founded upon the fundamental premise that "high quality delivery of education has the capacity to transform Wales and its future prosperity" and sets out a series of key actions, under a number of main themes, that stakeholders should take to secure a positive future.

3.32 The following extracts from the report serve to reinforce the importance of MEP as an enabling strategy towards an effective education service for the future:

3.35 The report presented to the Executive Board in July 2006 re-emphasised the intrinsically volatile nature of the MEP programme. It is unavoidable that MEP will be subject to ongoing and frequent change as it is dependant upon a number of variable factors, many of which are outside the direct control of the Council.

3.36 It has become increasingly evident as time has passed that whilst the first generation MEP plan was subject to considerable thought, analysis and forward planning, considerable change to the published Timeline has already become necessary. Whilst much of the strategic planning at the core of MEP remains viable and relevant the project programme presented originally can no longer be relied upon as a robust implementation strategy. Significant changes have already become necessary to a number of projects in the early years of the programme, as indicated in the report to the Executive Board in July 2006. Changes to the scope of projects have an immediate impact on their estimated capital cost. The result of the changes made to date has been to significantly increase the cost of the overall programme.

3.37 Other factors, including a developing policy framework as outlined above, are also influencing the pressures on the overall programme, the individual projects within it and the order in which they ought sensibly to be brought forward.

3.38 For example, significant change has been taking place within some communities in Carmarthenshire, not least through rapid and extensive development. The success of the Council's regeneration programmes and a buoyant housing market over the past couple of years have resulted in large numbers of residential properties being built and occupied and these are now beginning to yield young people requiring school education. It is apparent that certain "hot spots" have emerged, placing pressure on spaces in a small number of primary schools. These schools are bucking the trend of falling rolls and a few are facing real challenges in meeting their obligations. The Department is working with schools to address these issues and where the schools are complying with Council policy regarding admissions there is an obligation upon the Education and Children's Services Department to assist the schools where practicable in overcoming their space constraints.

3.39 At a very small number of locations this may need to include the provision of further temporary accommodation for an interim period pending the implementation of a long-term solution. The present status of MEP is such that the lead in period for new projects yet to be introduced into the approved three year funding programme is at least four years to the completion and commissioning of a permanent solution. Those schools complying with Council's admissions policy and experiencing real space pressures cannot reasonably be expected to wait that long for any assistance. The removal of temporary accommodation is a fundamental objective of MEP and so the provision of further mobiles will be an absolute last resort and only undertaken when all other practical options have been examined and discounted. When instances warranting intervention of this nature arise appropriate provision will be made within the approved funding programme.

3.40 The forward work programme of consultations on school reorganisations or closures is being affected by changes taking place naturally within the school population. This is especially so in the case of very small schools. Pupil driven changes, for example, through numbers at a school declining quicker than anticipated, necessitate the consideration of individual schools or groups of schools sooner than originally planned. As situations such as this arise the MEP consultation programme needs to be regarded flexibly and changes to the planned programme effected as necessary, subject to the capacity available to process consultation exercises and undertake formal procedures.

4 MEP PROGRAMME 2007 - 2008

4.1 In continuing to develop the MEP programme as a large strategic investment plan it is imperative that the Council can be confident that it is achieving the best possible use of its financial resources. In order to achieve this a review of the order of priority for the projects within the programme, reflecting the issues summarised in the previous sections of this report and earlier reports, has been commenced.

4.2 The programme proposed for 2007/2008 takes account of the change factors referred to and is presented as an effective strategy to move MEP forward in a considered and coherent way.

4.3 In July 2006 the Executive Board resolved that the MEP capital programme should thereafter be presented in the form of a three-year expenditure plan, consistent with the corporate capital programme, that indicates firm intentions for the active financial year with provisional proposals for the subsequent two years. The three-year programme to be reviewed on a rolling annual basis to reflect changing circumstances over time.

4.4 The MEP Programme for 2007/2008, covering construction projects, school rationalisation proposals and project development activity is detailed in Appendix 3. The MEP Capital Investment Plan 2007/2008 (with provisional proposals for 2008/2009 and 2009/2010) is included in Appendix 4.

4.5 The capital plan indicates an intention to invest over £28 million across 23 school infrastructure improvement projects in 2007/2008. This includes the use of £3.4 million of SBIG from WAG.

4.6 It should be noted that the indicated costs for projects yet to be taken to competitive tender (Peniel, Ysgol Y Dderwen, Llannon, Brynsaron, Halfway) are based upon the latest available estimates. The robustness of these estimates will depend upon the extent to which the project design has been developed and it is possible, therefore, that the cost estimates presented in Appendix 4 will change as development work matures. Cost estimates for a number of schemes have been revised in accordance with the latest information available (Brynsierfel, Morfa, Lakefield/Copperworks) whilst the estimates for other projects (Whitland, Ystradowen/Cefnbrynbrain) will need to be reviewed in the light of further project development work yet to be undertaken and information not yet available.

Recommendation 2

4.6 The Executive Board approves the detailed MEP programme and capital investment plan for 2007/2008.

APPENDIX 2

MEP Progress Report 2006 - 2007

APPENDIX 3

MEP Programme 2007 - 2008

APPENDIX 4

MEP Capital Investment Plan 2007/2008

MEP Capital Investment Plan 2007/2008

APPENDIX 5

Glossary of Abbreviations

Glossary of Abbreviations